Navigation


University

   - Philosophy Home
   - Ethics Home
   - GEC Home
   - TAMUCC
   - TAMUCC SAIL
   - Phone Book
   - Liberal Arts
   - Bell Library

Topics

   - Announcements
   - Applied Ethics
   - Epistemology
   - Ethics
   - Logic
   - Metaphysics
   - Minds & Machines
   - News
   - Philosophy Club
   - Philosophy Fun
   - Philosophy of Religion
   - Philosophy of Science
   - Quotes
   - Radio
   - All Topics

Accounts

   - Preferences
   - User Info
   - Edit User
   - Messaging
   - Change Password
   - Logout

Discussions

   - Active
   - Older
   - Past Polls
   - Journals
   - Messages
   - Suggest New
   - Search

Courses


Spring, 2008

Don Berkich

   - Intro to Philosophy
   - Minds and Machines
   - Advanced Logic

Andy Piker

   - Intro to Logic
   - Ethics Recitation

Stefan Sencerz

   - Ethics Recitation
   - Eastern Philosophy

Glenn Tiller

   - Ethics Lecture
   - Ethics Recitation

Other

   - Previous Courses
   - Reading Groups

Faculty


Don Berkich

   Ph.D., UMass-Amherst
     Language
     Epistemology
     Metaphysics
     Mind

   Home Page
   Email
   FC-283 : 825-3976


Andrew Piker

   Ph.D., Vanderbilt
     Ethical Theory
     Applied Ethics
     Modern Philosophy

   Home Page
   Email
   FC-276 : 825-6035


Stefan Sencerz

   Ph.D., Rochester
     Moral Philosophy
     Applied Ethics
     Epistemology

   Home Page
   Email
   FC-261 : 825-2392


Glenn Tiller

   Ph.D., Toronto
     Epistemology
     Metaphysics
     Pragmatism

   Home Page
   Email
   FC-268 : 825-6008

 

Steampunk Hits the Mainstream

posted by Don Berkich on Friday May 09, @05:14AM
from the trendy-trends dept.

Philosophy Fun Having been the subject of an article, below, in the NY Times, steampunk is surely passé. Yet those with a fondness for Verne, Wells, Gibson, goggles, brass, and romantic invention will doubtless be undeterred.


(Read More... | 12460 bytes in body)

Mathematical Objects

posted by Don Berkich on Friday May 09, @05:08AM
from the peculiar-and-perplexing-puzzles dept.

Metaphysics ScienceNews has an article--light on philosophers; heavy on mathematicians--about the nature of mathematical objects. From the article's lede,

    Think too hard about it, and mathematics starts to seem like a mighty queer business. For example, are new mathematical truths discovered or invented? Seems like a simple enough question, but for millennia, it has provided fodder for arguments among mathematicians and philosophers.

    Those who espouse discovery note that mathematical statements are true or false regardless of personal beliefs, suggesting that they have some external reality. But this leads to some odd notions. Where, exactly, do these mathematical truths exist? Can a mathematical truth really exist before anyone has ever imagined it?


(Read More...)

An Evolutionary Psychologist's Take on Akrasia

posted by Don Berkich on Friday May 09, @04:57AM
from the weakness-of-will dept.

Minds and Machines The LA Times recently had an OpEd piece, below, by psychologist Gary Marcus speculating on how evolution shaped our wills. From the article,

    The problem is that evolution failed to realize that remembering goals is not like recognizing objects. When your brain sees a lion, the thing to do is to decide, lickety-split, to get out of the way. Run first; ask questions later. We're programmed for just that kind of split-second decision; just about every creature on the planet is built such that it can identify things like predators and prey very rapidly. We're not programmed to remember precise episodes from the past. Why not? Because remembering the exact date on which you last saw a lion is not particularly helpful when you're trying to get out of the way. Alas, evolution didn't have the foresight to realize that different kinds of tasks require different kinds of memory, and it used the same basic sort of memory for everything, not just for remembering what lions and tigers look like (in which general tendencies suffice) but also for cases -- like tracking our goals -- where a bit more precision would have been helpful.


(Read More... | 8573 bytes in body)

Philosophy Club: Coffee Talk Friday, 4/25, in New Location!

posted by Don Berkich on Wednesday April 23, @07:46AM
from the cafe-mocha dept.

Philosophy Club The Philosophy Club will host its last Coffee Talk of the semester this Friday, 4/25, at 11:00 a.m. in a new location: Coffee Waves, 5738 S. Alameda (map here, but it's just off-campus across from the Oso Golf Course. Take Ennis Joslin to Alameda, turn right onto Alameda, and look for the wavy blue building on your right).

All are invited for a bit of caffeinated conversation!


(Read More... | Philosophy Club)

Of Weird Computers and Cool Research

posted by Don Berkich on Sunday April 20, @08:08AM
from the creativity dept.

Minds and Machines Underscoring Searle's point that nearly any physical system can be seen as a computer, New Scientist has a "top-ten" list of the strangest computers to date, including optical computers, quantum computers, DNA computers, and the "Glooper" computer.

Network World ups the ante by listing 25 innovative University IT research projects.


(Read More...)

"Expelled" Review

posted by Don Berkich on Sunday April 20, @07:53AM
from the ouch dept.

Philosophy of Science Following Barbara Forrest's recent visit and her mention of the 'documentary' "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed", the NY Times has a blistering review of the movie. From the review,

    Mixing physical apples and metaphysical oranges at every turn, “Expelled” is an unprincipled propaganda piece that insults believers and nonbelievers alike. In its fudging, eliding and refusal to define terms, the movie proves that the only expulsion here is of reason itself.


(Read More... | 2952 bytes in body | 1 comment)

Evolution Myths

posted by Don Berkich on Thursday April 17, @12:30AM
from the timely-articles dept.

Philosophy of Science In advance of Dr. Forrest's visit this Friday--announcement here--NewScientist has a useful article: "Evolution: 24 myths and misconceptions".


(Read More...)

Announcements: Distinguished Lecturer Series, Barbara Forrest

posted by Don Berkich on Monday April 14, @11:29AM
from the upcoming-events dept.

Announcement The College of Science and Technology Distinguished Lecturer Series presents Barbara Forrest, SLU Professor of Philosophy.

Dr. Forrest was a key expert witness in the Dover Case and co-authored Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design with biologist Paul R. Gross.

Dr. Forrest will lecture this Friday, 4/18, at 3:30 p.m. in the Harte Research Institute (HRI) Room 127.

    “Inside Creationism's Trojan Horse: A Closer Look at Intelligent Design”

    In 1996, the Discovery Institute, a conservative Seattle think tank, established its Center for Science and Culture. From this obscure organization, which is the headquarters of the intelligent design (ID) creationist movement in the United States, have come virtually all of the major creationist flare-ups in the last twelve years. Although its proponents present ID as a new "scientific paradigm," it is the direct descendant of the "scientific creationism" of the 1980s. Discovery Institute creationists and their supporters are attacking both state science standards and local science curricula. Using seemingly harmless code language, they are disguising their effort to get ID into public school science classes as an "alternative" scientific theory. They insist that students must be taught the "controversy" surrounding evolution, which requires teaching the "strengths and weaknesses" of "Darwinism." However, the movement's leaders themselves define ID in religious terms and have admitted the scientific sterility of their program. Nonetheless, they continue to execute their "Wedge Strategy," which is nothing less than a plan to completely undermine both public school science education and the constitutional separation of church and state.


(Read More... | Announcements)

Doing Before Deciding

posted by Don Berkich on Monday April 14, @11:26AM
from the troubling-illusions dept.

Minds and Machines Following up on an earlier discussion, Wired is reporting that, "[i]n a study published Sunday in Nature Neuroscience, researchers using brain scanners could predict people's decisions seven seconds before the test subjects were even aware of making them. "


(Read More... | 2 comments)

The Unpredictable Trajectory of Science and Technology

posted by Don Berkich on Sunday April 13, @06:36AM
from the hard-sci-fi dept.

Philosophy of Science The Washington Post's Joel Achenbach writes about why we're so bad at predicting the world we ourselves are busy creating in the article below. From the article,

    It's not just us mortals, even scientists don't always grasp the significance of innovations. Tomorrow's revolutionary technology may be in plain sight, but everyone's eyes, clouded by conventional thinking, just can't detect it. "Even smart people are really pretty incapable of envisioning a situation that's substantially different from what they're in," says Christine Peterson, vice president of Foresight Nanotech Institute in Menlo Park, Calif.

    So where does that leave the rest of us?

    In technological Palookaville.

    Science is becoming ever more specialized; technology is increasingly a series of black boxes, impenetrable to but a few. Americans' poor science literacy means that science and technology exist in a walled garden, a geek ghetto. We are a technocracy in which most of us don't really understand what's happening around us. We stagger through a world of technological and medical miracles. We're zombified by progress.

    Peterson has one recommendation: Read science fiction, especially "hard science fiction" that sticks rigorously to the scientifically possible. "If you look out into the long-term future and what you see looks like science fiction, it might be wrong," she says. "But if it doesn't look like science fiction, it's definitely wrong."


(Read More... | 10506 bytes in body)

 

Login

Nickname:

Password:

[ Create a new account ]

Poll

Least Helpful Paper Comment
Huh?
Awk!
Ack!
Grrrr...
?
!
lol
other (see below)
[ Results | Polls ]
Comments:0 | Votes:2

Events

Spring 2008

Satire Nights
   Existence
   Monday, 2/28, 8:00 p.m.
   ST-108 (if avail.)

Coffee Talk
   Friday, 2/8, 11:00 a.m.
   Java City/Library Plaza

Satire Nights
   Death Penalty
   Monday, 2/18, 8:00 p.m.
   ST-101

Moratorium Forum
   Death Penalty
   Friday, 2/22, 5:00 p.m.
   BH-104

Ethics Bowl Luncheon
   Friday, 2/29, 11:00 a.m.
   Location TBA

Satire Nights
   Doing Good
   Monday, 3/3, 8:00 p.m.
   ST-101

Coffee Talk
   Friday, 3/14, 11:00 a.m.
   Java City/Library Plaza

Spring Break Party
   Friday, 3/4, 4:00 p.m.
   B&J's Pizza

Satire Nights
   Corporations
   Monday, 3/24, 8:00 p.m.
   ST-101

Coffee Talk
   Friday, 4/4, 11:00 a.m.
   Java City/Library Plaza

----CANCELED----
Student Presentation
   Dana Mears: EvoPsych
   Monday, 4/14, 8:00 p.m.
   Location TBA
----CANCELED----

S&T Distinguished Lecturer
   Dr. Barbara Forrest
   “Inside Creationism's Trojan Horse: A Closer Look at Intelligent Design”
   Friday, 4/18, 3:30 p.m.
   HRI 127

Coffee Talk
   Friday, 4/25, 11:00 a.m.
   New Location:
   Coffee Waves
   5738 S. Alameda (map)

End of Semester Party
   Tuesday, 5/6, 6:00 p.m.
   B&J's Pizza

Program

What is Philosophy?

Why study Philosophy?

Who studies Philosophy?

What is the Philosophy Minor?

What is the Philosophy Major?

Podcasts

Cleese on Philosophy (wav)
The Guerrilla Radio Show
In Our Time (BBC)
The Locke Lectures (Oxford)
New York Academy of Sciences
Philosophy Bites
Philosophy Talk (Stanford)
Point of Inquiry

Research

Bell Library Resources

   Library Homepage
   Philosophy Journals
   Interlibrary Loan

Keyword Searchable Indices

   Philosopher's Index (oncampus)
   Philosopher's Index
   Philosophy of Mind
   Noesis
   Google Scholar

Texts

   Ancient Texts
   Early Modern Texts
   eBooks@Adelaide

Papers

   MindPapers
   Online Papers in Philosophy
   Papers on Agency
   Papers by Subject and Philosopher
   Philosophy of Mind
   Centre for Consciousness
   The PhilSci Archive

Journals

   The Australasian Journal of Logic
   Ethics and Social Responsibility
   Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
   The Philosophers' Imprint
   The Reasoner
   The Richmond Journal of Philosophy

Encyclopedias

   The Internet Encyclopedia
   The Stanford Encyclopedia

Link Sites

   Philosophy Resources
   Suber's Guide
   EpistemeLinks
   Journal Links (Peter Milne)
   Journal Links (Peter King)

Other Sites

   American Philosophical Association
   Ask a Philosopher (US)
   Ask a Philosopher (UK)
   Philosophy Conferences
   The Philosopher's Magazine

Other Stuff

Conscious Entities
Consequently.org
Crooked Timber
Desert Landscapes
ephilosopher
Experimental Philosophy
fragments of consciousness
The Garden of Forking Paths
Graduate School
Leiter Reports
LogBlog
PEA Soup
Philosophy of Art
Philosophers' Carnival
Philosophical Humor
Philosophical Weblogs
Riddles
Thoughts, Arguments, and Rants
Turning the Tide

Older Stuff

Sunday April 13

  • Rebellious Robots (0)
  • Tuesday April 08

  • Famous Psychology Experiments Based on Logical Fallacy (0)
  • Monday April 07

  • More Catching On (0)
  • Friday April 04

  • Seven Modern Engineering Marvels (0)
  • Tuesday April 01

  • Stephen Colbert, Philosophy Major (0)
  • Sunday March 30

  • Missed Cues (0)
  • The Literary Deal Breaker (0)
  • Saturday March 29

  • Lawsuit Filed to Stop the LHC from Destroying the Earth (0)
  • Thursday March 27

  • A Bat There is Nothing It is Like to Be (0)
  • Voices from the Past (0)
  • Monday March 24

  • The Myth of Monogamy (0)
  • Thursday March 13

  • Dextre in Orbit (0)
  • Monday March 10

  • Is Academic Doping Just Like Sports Doping? (0)
  • Thursday March 06