Jackson's Mary
Define Physicalism as the thesis that all the (relevant) facts are physical facts.
The Knowledge Argument | |||
1 | If Physicalism is true, then it is not possible to know all the physical facts without knowing all the facts. | ||
2 | It is possible to know all the physical facts without knowing all the facts. | ||
∴ | 3 | Physicalism is not true. | 1&2 |
Fred is able to consistently sort tomatoes into two piles, because Fred is able to distinguish between two kinds of red (what he calls "red-1" and "red-2"). He calls the rest of us red-1 and red-2 color-blind, because we cannot distinguish between objects that are red-1 and objects that are red-2. Yet we can determine all the neurophysiological facts about Fred.
The Case of Fred | |||
1 | We can determine all the physical facts about Fred, but we cannot determine what it is like for Fred to see red-1 and red-2. | ||
2 | If (1), then it is possible to know all the physical facts without knowing all the facts. | ||
∴ | 3 | It is possible to know all the physical facts without knowing all the facts. | 1&2 |
Mary is an expert in vision. She has, however, gained her expertise over black-and-white television while in a black-and-white room. Mary has never seen the color red, so she does not know what it is like to see red. What she does know are all the facts of neurophysiology pertaining to vision.
The Case of Mary | |||
1 | Mary knows all the physical facts, but she does not know all the facts. | ||
2 | If (1), then it is possible to know all the physical facts without knowing all the facts. | ||
∴ | 3 | It is possible to know all the physical facts without knowing all the facts. | 1&2 |